After just one month since the arrival of the Nintendo DS, Sony proved that ‘horizontal innovation’ is not the only means to succeed in the portable console market.
This article is dedicated to anyone that wants to understand, straight to the point, how the PSP operates. It’s not a short write-up, but I hope that at the end of the reading you will be able to grasp the building blocks of this console (its design rationale, choice of CPUs, GPU pipeline, security system and so forth).
P.S. If you ever feel fed up with information, don’t forget to take a look at the diagrams (the main one plus the others I made for each section).
Similarly to Nintendo, Sony built an extremely packed System-on-Chip that houses most of the component we are going to discuss throughout this article. This includes the ‘main’ CPU in charge of executing games/programs (unlike other CPUs we’ll talk about in due time). The SoC is called Tachyon, a name chosen by Sony themselves (after watching some Star Trek?).
Moving on, the main CPU is also an in-house design by Sony. In the official documents, they refer to it as a ‘MIPS core’ which borrows some IP from the MIPS R4000 (you may remember Nintendo doing something alike). This new design is called Allegrex and runs at a variable speed, from 33 MHz to 333 MHz.
Allegrex is a complete 32-bit core offering:
In conclusion: Allegrex is incredibly fast. However, we still don’t know what can you do with it. After all, you can imagine this CPU as the conductor of an orchestra, and we haven’t checked out the performers… yet.
As with any MIPS R4000, Allegrex has three coprocessor slots. Sony added two:
Let me talk for a moment about the memory unit included in this system. Its modus operandi can be seen as a bit primitive at first, but we’ll see why it’s optimal for the needs of this console.
A traditional Memory Management Unit or ‘MMU’ takes care of giving the CPU access to the components surrounding it, this implies that all the address lines of the CPU will be connected to the MMU; and the latter is connected to the rest of the system.
This is particularly advantageous to provide features like ‘virtual memory’ and ‘memory protection’. Well, to achieve virtual memory, the MMU contains a component called Translation look-aside buffer or ‘TLB’ to prevent performance degradation. Now, Allegrex’s MMU lacks a TLB, so it focuses on the second example (memory protection). This is why ‘MPU’ is more appropriate name for Allegrex’s MMU. An MPU is a cutdown version of an MMU without virtual memory. In any case, memory protection gives the system the power to decide which memory locations a program can access.
Thanks to this, Allegrex won’t have to deal with user-land programs (i.e. games) accessing restricted locations (i.e. encryption keys). To accomplish this, memory addresses are grouped into five segments with different privilege levels set. Furthermore, our MPU contains three modes of operation: User mode, Supervisor mode and Kernel mode.
If a normal process (operating in ‘user mode’) wants to access a memory address found in a privileged location, the MPU will ask the operating system (through the use of ‘exceptions’) if the process should access it and the execution will continue from there.
All in all, this allows Sony, the developer of the operating system, to implement a security system enforced by hardware.
So far we’ve analysed the main CPU and its accelerators. Now let’s see the physical memory available in this system.
The PSP comes with two memory blocks accessible from the CPU:
You’ll soon find that the PSP accommodates lots of components with unique functionality. So, to organise them without repeating previous mistakes, engineers interconnected them using dedicated buses. Thus, only small groups of components, with similar applications, will share the same bus. At the same time, those buses talk to each other using dedicated arbiters (in the form of ‘memory controllers’ or ‘DMA’).
All of the buses found in Tachyon implement a well-known design called Advanced High-performance Bus or ‘AHB’. A solution by Arm that also tackles this issue with their chips and SoCs. If you are curious, AHB is also used in the Wii.
That being said, the following buses are constructed:
All three buses connect to the DDR Controller, which is where main RAM is found.
Inside each bus, there will be multiple components working independently. Consequently, they will store processed data in a shared space (such as main RAM). Now, we don’t want the CPU to intervene whenever a module needs to read or write from memory. Traditionally, a DMA unit was placed in the bus to provide this facility, but a single DMA can only do so much and Sony placed a significant number of components which eventually, will lead to bottlenecks.
So, the solution is very simple: Bus Mastering. In a nutshell, each component will get its own DMA controller. This gives them the ability to become the ‘bus master’ and take control of the bus to access whatever location they want. To avoid contention (multiple ‘bus masters’ at the same time), the neighbouring components will acknowledge this event and wait until the operation completes.
Up to this point, we’ve discussed the main CPU and the buses inside Tachyon, but there’s still many features found in this SoC. In particular, there’s another block of modules designed for a particular application: Multimedia. The group specialised in audio and image processing, including the combination of both (video processing), and it operates without consuming bandwidth from the main CPU group (the ‘System group’).
That being said, the new block is called Media Engine Group and it’s composed of the following components:
Needless to say, the media engine is not directly operable from the developer’s side (Sony hides all of it through a thick API). The official SDK includes libraries like ‘libmpeg’ or ‘libmp3’ which already implement complete applications optimised for this engine.
Let’s go back to the ‘System group’ now since the engine in charge of generating pixels is found within this block. It’s organised as a ‘group within a group’ but you don’t have to worry about that now. The group we will be talking about now is called Graphics Engine or ‘GE’.
The GE draws 3D graphics (polygons) with many features applied (texture mapping, lighting and so much more) which you’ll see in a bit.
Before we continue, let’s go over the physical aspects of this console, which is where the user can appreciate everything that will be discussed here.
So, the PSP carries a 4.3" TFT LCD screen. It has a resolution of 480x272 pixels (for reference, it’s ~2.6 times the pixels of one screen of the Nintendo DS) and can display up to 16,777,216 colours. Thus, it’s got a 24-bit colour depth (the so-called ‘True Color’ scale).
The aspect ratio is almost 16:9, a format that during that time was increasingly becoming a standard on home tellies as well. Notice that a wider range of view is also an opportunity for game designers to improve game experience (especially in the first-person shooting genre).
The GE subsystem has lots of interesting quirks to mention, so this will be a very complex section. But fear not! I’ll try to go step-by-step to avoid any confusions.
First things first, the Graphics Engine is made of three types of components:
The reason for this design is that both main CPU and the Graphics Core can access those 2 MB of eDRAM. So, to prevent congestions, the traffic inside the Graphics Engine goes through another AHB bus called Local Bus (‘local’ from the perspective of the GE). This allows the Graphics Core to perform its functions without depending on the System Bus to move data around (and consequently stalling the rest of the system).
The Local Bus is as wide as the System Bus (128-bit), but if that wasn’t enough, the Graphics core has a direct line to eDRAM using a 512-bit bus (made of two unidirectional 256-bit buses), you’ll see why it will be needed in the following section.
What about how the CPU and GE communicate with each other? As I said before, both CPU and Graphics Core can read from eDRAM. Additionally, the Graphics Core can access the System Bus to fetch data from any other component (including main RAM). So, all of that just doesn’t happen magically.
In a nutshell, there are two ‘Bus Matrix’ blocks that re-wire the connection between the Local bus and the System Bus. Whenever there’s a component that wants to access an ‘alien’ bus, the Bus Matrices configure the communication so that one unit becomes a bus master of the two buses and no other overlaps, until the designated unit finishes transferring memory.
In Sony’s docs, they refer to it as the Graphics Core or CPU becoming a ‘bus master’ while the alien bus is set to ‘slave’. However, they didn’t spend a lot of words trying to explain it and I’m not sure which protocol/standard they are trying to replicate. Based on what’s documented, I think it may be somewhat similar to I²C, a protocol used for serial communications (particularly useful with embedded systems) which also performs bus mastering.
Now that we’ve seen what components we got and how they interact with each other, let’s find out what information related to graphics we can place in memory.
There are three memory locations from which the GE will end up pulling or filling:
Like its home sibling, the Graphics System focuses on rasterization. Although, VRAM is half the size and the bus is not as fast. To compensate, the GE features a vector processor!
The graphics pipeline is very similar to the PS2, with the addition of the vector processing stage. The Graphics core is divided into two areas: The Surface Engine which deals with vector processing and Rendering Engine which, as its name indicates, performs rasterisation and effects.
The pipeline is not explicitly documented by Sony, just its features. Thus, I’ve deduced a model myself. This is only done for the sake of analysis in these series (programmers don’t depend on this to build their game).
On another note, I’ve decided to make it a bit more technical than previously. I thought this would be a good opportunity to learn new concepts and have a wider vision of computing graphics. Having said that, I strongly recommend reading about the PS1 and PS2 graphics system before continuing.
The Graphics engine is controlled using traditional ‘Display lists’ stored in main memory. The CPU builds them and the GPU reads them (using DMA). Display Lists basically tell the GPU what, how and where to draw. In the case of the PSP, a display list is not limited to rendering tasks, they can also include vector transformations.
The strategy implemented to process lists is critical to ensure both CPU and GPU work concurrently and don’t stall each other. Remember, we want the GPU to accelerate operations, not to be a burden. Hence, the CPU/GPU support deferred rendering, a technique that allows the CPU to build the next set of display lists while the GPU is processing a previous one. The GE is configured by specifying where in memory the display list starts (base address) and where it stops (stall address). As a result, there are two ways of allocating a list:
Furthermore, Sony stated that the GPU’s DMA unit is not just a ‘dumb memory copier’ - it can also understand the data transferred. Thus, display lists can include commands such as ‘Jump’ and ‘Return’ to tell the DMA to branch out and get data from somewhere else. This saves the CPU from embedding large resources (models, textures, etc) in the display lists (effectively duplicating data in memory) and reduces bandwidth consumption. This was inherited from the PS2.
Finally, the DMA can also interpret Bounding Box data: Combined with information stored in the Graphics Engine, the DMA will skip drawing commands that aren’t within the display area. It’s also possible to declare bounding boxes inside other bounding boxes, but let’s leave that topic for another day!
The GE debuts the ability to perform operations over vectors, which helps to offload a lot of work from the CPU. Sony built this unit to accelerate common tasks previously carried out by the PS2’s VPUs using microcode. While the GE is not as flexible as a VPU (the GE is a fixed-function unit), it does simplify a lot of coding (considering microcode had a considerable weight on the learning curve). The GE’s vector processor is called Surface Engine.
That being said, the Surface Engine undertakes three types of tasks. The first one operates parametric surfaces. Remember the ‘Infinite Worlds’ section? Well, Sony explained that, while the PS2 was indeed capable of this, in the end just a few games bothered. It’s possible that polygon performance, along with the difficulty in design and implementation, were the main factors.
To tackle this, the Surface Engine implements two parametric curves:
Both support levels of detail, which means that developers can set an arbitrary value to alter the level of subdivision (impacting in the resulting quality of the model).
The second task is called vertex blending, a technique used for animations. The Surface engine provides two types:
It’s important to denote that the CPU may still need to compute animations to process game logic (i.e. collision detection) so the CPU can’t offload all the work.
Finally, the Surface Engine provides scissoring (discarding vertices outside the viewport/rectangular area) as well.
This is the starting point of the Rendering Engine (skipping the command processor). In here, vector data is transformed into pixels, which is pretty much in pace with any other GPU in the market.
The engine draws many types of primitives, including points, lines, line strips, triangles, triangle strips, triangle fans and, finally, sprites (made of 2D rectangles). It also contains a unit called ‘Digital Differential Analyser’ that will be used for interpolating values during rasterisation and texture mapping.
Developers can supply a projection matrix to apply perspective transformation, this sends their 3D world to a 2D space (so you can see it on the screen) using the camera as a reference.
Sony didn’t provide much information about how its rasteriser works in particular, so it’s not well-known how many pixels are processed per cycle, for instance. Modern features, like sub-pixel precision, are assumed to be implemented (otherwise, users would’ve been able to spot its absence right away).
This may be the topic of most interest for some. Polygons (now mere pixels) can be painted with textures. At this stage, texture maps are fetched from memory and processed with many functions. This process is called Texture Mapping.
The Rendering Engine has three mapping modes or, in other words, three ways of processing texture maps:
Textures may use Colour Lookup Tables or ‘CLUTs’. Furthermore, this engine applies perspective correction and bilinear or trilinear filtering for interpolation.
On another topic, there’s 8 KB of texture cache found in GE to save bandwidth, it uses the ‘Least Recently Used’ method for space management.
Finally, while this pipeline is not programmable, developers can send extra colours to be blended with textures. There’s also colour doubling (doubles the RGB value of colours), colour addition (combines a primary colour with a secondary colour) and Fogging (haze over far away polygons).
We’re reaching the end of the pipeline. The initial geometry has been transformed into pixels and these are now rich-coloured, so it’s time to decide what to do with them.
Some pixels may correspond to geometry that it’s not needed for this frame (i.e. occluded, masked, etc). To filter that out, the GE can perform the following tests:
Afterwards, pixels will also travel through these optional blocks for further effects:
ORand many more).
Complex functions like antialiasing are the result of a strategic combination of the above. Finally, the outputted pixel is written to the frame-buffer, which in turn is broadcasted for display.
As evidenced, the PSP inherits various features from the PS2. The difference, however, is that functionality is now hardwired in the silicon, as opposed to offering many general-purpose programmable units (which require manual work to set them up). I presume this was done for two reasons: To use fewer transistors (so it fits in Tachyon and the board remains ‘portable’) and to facilitate porting PS2 codebase to the new console.
To show how this system impacted model design and to help compare it to the PS2 and/or Nintendo DS, here are two examples of models designed for the PSP. Don’t forget the viewer is interactive!
The first model of this console (1000) has a proprietary port called Remote Port at the bottom-left corner (next to the audio jack).
It uses the RS232 protocol, an old standard for transferring data in serial. Though it wasn’t publicly available to developers (let alone documented), a couple of audio headsets with control buttons appeared on the market. They apparently use the serial port to send commands (play, pause, etc) to the console.
In later models (2000 and 3000), the remote port was expanded with an extra YCbCr pinout. Sony shipped three video cables (Component, S-Video and Composite) that rely on this interface to enable users to see the contents of the PSP screen on the TV.
The video cable will send a frame with a resolution of 720x480 pixels (in NTSC) or 720x576 pixels (in PAL), in progressive or interlaced mode (the latter option is only available on the 3000 model). Considering the PSP’s resolution is 480x272 pixels, games will show black bars to correct the aspect ratio. Although, the bars won’t show when console is running the ‘XMB’ visual shell, as it natively supports adjusting its resolution for the video cable.
In this section we tend to encounter a PSG, sequencer or a large mixer. This is because, at the end of the day, dedicated audio hardware is meant to offload audio operations from the CPU. Although, if this hardware tuns out to be ‘weak’, it degrades the sound capabilities of the console.
Now, what we consider ‘sound hardware’ in the PSP is very barebones: Only two PCM channels and a stereo mixer. The maximum sampling rate and resolution are 48 KHz and 16-bit, respectively.
I don’t see any of the accelerators I mentioned in the first paragraph. So, does this imply that the sound will be as limited as other cases showed? No! Because the hardware of the PSP enables to compensate it with more software.
You see, while there isn’t a large amount of sound-related circuitry, there’s a lot of general-purpose components that Sony supplied. They can help with audio decoding, streaming and mixing. I’m talking about the Media Engine.
That block is very good at signal processing, but it needs to be programmed. So, Sony wrote the following software running on the Media Engine to complement the two PCM channels (we’ll call them ‘endpoint’):
Games don’t have access to these modules directly. Instead, they call many libraries included in the official SDK. Some libs are designed to operate raw signals while others are optimised for particular applications, examples include:
Let’s put all this into practice by taking a look at how games reproduced their sound. I wrote this special player that allows you to swap between consoles (to enable side-by-side comparisons):
In the first example, the Nintendo DS game sequences its music on-the-fly while the PSP one decodes ATRAC3. As you can see, having no dedicated sound hardware per se doesn’t imply ending up with the worst quality. In fact, one could argue the opposite, as the Media Engine provided more features than most sound chips of previous portable consoles ever did.
The second example is much trickier to quantify. I placed a PS2 tune for comparison, but I had to boost the PS2 one a bit (I presume PSP soundtracks are louder to compensate for the smaller speaker and the proximity to the user). Also, bear in mind that the arrangements are slightly different between platforms. It’s possibly just a creative change since the PSP game was released five years after the PS2 one. Overall, the PSP doesn’t show deterioration (considering the PS2’s SPU2 is very powerful and flexible).
The PSP has plenty of connections and sensors. However, this section will be a good opportunity to introduce some chipsets that haven’t been mention yet, and they play a big part in handling the circuitry that detects the player’s input.
Most of the I/O available is linked in the Peripheral Bus. It’s only 32-bit wide which is enough to transfer simple information at a normal pace. It has access to main RAM as well.
The D-Pad, joystick and buttons are handled by a unique chip referred to as ‘System Control’ or SysCon, this is a common codename in Sony’s hardware and it deals with interfacing many internal components. In this case, it’s just the physical buttons.
The console features a good amount of connections:
The use of a standard port such as USB enabled companies to design accessories for this console.
Examples of commercialised accessories include:
The funny thing is that these gadgets were also available for Pocket PC/PDAs as well, it makes you think if Sony envisioned the PSP as a PocketPC for youngsters.
After the release of the Playstation 3, a new feature appeared on the PSP: Remote Play. Using a WiFi connection, the PS3 could be remotely controlled from the PSP.
This was many years before the Wii U launched, eh? Unfortunately, only a handful of PS3 games supported remote play, meaning users could only navigate through the menus, do some multimedia and play Playstation 1 games.
Over the years, the program in charge of controlling the console before a game starts has become more and more convoluted. Mainly due to the increasingly need for security and services (updatable APIs, online multiplayer, multimedia, etc). The PSP will try to fit all of that in very constrained hardware. Now, I don’t mean to say that the result will be mediocre, but many decisions are the result of balancing costs, performance and robustness.
First and foremost, the PSP contains a hidden/undocumented 4 KB ROM inside Tachyon where the boot-loader is. In other words, upon powering on, the CPU will start by looking for instructions in there. That ROM has many names, including ‘Bootrom’, ‘Pre-IPL’ and ‘Lib-PSP iplloader’. The latter is the internal codename used by Sony.
The rest of the system is installed in 32 MB of NAND Flash found in the motherboard. Here is where the majority of the PSP’s Operating system is residing.
The Operating System is composed of the following components:
A Module is what we would call a ‘program’ or ‘driver’ in the PC/Windows world. Once loaded, modules may reside in memory and perform the following tasks:
A Module binary may be encrypted or decrypted, it also embeds metadata to define whether it’s a ‘user module’ or ‘kernel module’ type, the latter allows the new module to control privileged areas in memory (where the Kernel resides).
Modules are summoned by the ‘Kernel’ or ‘Visual Shell’, user modules can execute other modules at the discretion of the Kernel. Consequently, the kernel will never load kernel modules from UMD discs, for instance.
While this Operating System doesn’t contain a Kernel per se, it has multiple components that fill in the duties of a traditional Kernel.
The first component is the IPL, which is loaded by the Pre-IPL and takes care of initialising the hardware. A part of IPL also stores unique information of the console (such as the MAC Address, serial number and ‘UMD authentication keys’). Overwriting this area causes catastrophic results! So, for obvious reasons, the UMD keys are duplicated a couple of times to survive corruption. The aforementioned section is called IDStorage.
The IPL then loads a set of kernel modules which handle low-level operations (memory management, multi-threading and file-system). They also implement memory access exceptions triggered by the MPU (remember the segmentation paragraph?). For the sake of simplicity, whenever I use the word ‘Kernel’ in this article, I’ll be referring to these kernel modules.
Having said that, the Kernel doesn’t do multitasking but it does implement cooperative multi-threading for single processes.
Moreover, the Kernel will persist in memory as long as the console has power, which is related to the fact programs (user modules) aren’t written for bare-metal. Instead, user modules rely upon functions exposed by kernel modules. Consequently, the Kernel reserves 4 MB of main RAM and another 4 MB for ‘volatile memory’ (temporary buffer for many operations, with access granted at request). Thus, it only leaves 24 MB of main RAM (out of 32 MB) for user programs.
NAND also houses other sections of the firmware.
Firstly, there’s the Visual Shell or ‘VSH’, which is the first thing the user notices after powering on the PSP. The VSH is a graphical user interface that allows the user to run games and other modules (only user-type ones). The Visual Shell is composed of multiple modules, some of which are only loaded upon request.
As a curious fact, the system call used to bootstraps retail games will first reboot the console then load the executable. Possibly to unload the Visual Shell and free up resources for the game.
Secondly, there is a second partition in NAND that stores user-related data, such as network settings. This partition is called ‘flash1’ (as opposed to ‘flash0’) and its content is referred to as System Settings.
Now that we’ve identified the main parts, let’s see how they organise to put the console into a ‘working state’ once we switch it on. Security is briefly discussed here, but I recommend reading the next section which goes into more depth.
That being said, the complex boot process works as follows:
This console debuts the famous XrossMediaBar or ‘XMB’ (at least, internationally speaking). XMB is the name of the feature-rich GUI shipped with the PSP.
From the Human-Computer Interaction standpoint, the XMB’s design reveals very interesting approaches for solving many interaction challenges (such as navigating around many depths of information, avoid flooding the user with options and fitting all these solutions in a 4.3" screen). In essence, information is organised by ‘categories’ and ‘elements’; and the D-Pad is the key to navigate through them. The Left/Right arrows switch between categories and Up/Down arrows select an element from the same category. It’s worth pointing out that all categories are found within the same hierarchy level. So, no entry is shown superimposed over the rest (impeding the insertion of attention-stealing advertisement and whatnot).
On another topic, the XMB provides customisation options, such as changing the background colour and re-arrange items. Moreover, it provides access to multimedia services and, of course, allows the user to load up the game (whether from a UMD or Memory Stick).
There’s also a file viewer embedded that’s used for both multimedia and save management.
As we’ve seen before, everything except Pre-IPL is stored in writable storage, and thus is ‘updatable’. Sony distributed firmware updates in the form of a downloadable file. Users could either manually download it or use the ‘System update’ assistant from XMB to automatically download it (using WiFi connection) and install it.
Some updates strengthened the security system by adding more layers of encryption on the boot process and integrity checks on kernel modules.
From the developer’s standpoint, some updates enhanced the APIs by adding more functions and correcting existing ones, consequently making games strongly dependent on a higher system version. Hence, users had to update their PSPs to play such games. However, new updates were always backwards compatible, so an old game should never break on an updated system (in theory).
From the user’s perspective, some updates brought new services, like a web browser, RSS reader and so forth. After the release of the Playstation 3, many online applications were ported to the PSP, such as the ‘Playstation Store’ and ‘Remote Play’.
For the first time in this series, games developed for this console are not written for bare-metal: Instead of relying on memory address and ports, they have to call modules to perform operations on the hardware. The APIs found in the official SDK are modelled after this design.
The development toolkit provided by Sony to game studios was developed by SN Systems (the same author of the PS1 and PS2 kits). The software kit required a Windows XP with Cygwin or a CentOS Linux setup.
In this kit we could find:
Initially, Sony only provided an emulator to test PSP software. This was later replaced with the PSP Hardware Tool: A PC-like tower connected to a dummy PSP case (similar to the Nintendo DS kit). The devkit connected to the workstation using a piece of software called ProDG (only available on Windows).
The PS1 and PS2 featured two types of storage, a read-only disc for loading games and a re-writable ‘memory card’ for storing saves and executables. The PSP continued this tradition using different methods. Considering it was their first -mainstream- portable console, how did Sony manage to find the right mediums? Well, taking into account they were the authors of the BetaMax, MiniDisc and so forth, you can guess what they did this time… introduce even more formats.
CDs and DVDs are too big, easily copiable and conventional readers won’t work in a shaky environment (those who tried listening to an audio CD on a Walkman while walking know what I’m talking about). So, Sony’s solution was a new invention from the ground up called Universal Media Disc or ‘UMD’, a proprietary medium.
UMDs hold either 900 MB or 1.8 GB depending on being single-layered or dual-layered, respectively. Not only UMDs differ physically from a DVD or MiniDVD, but they also contain a different internal structure. Apart from games, Sony published the ‘UMD Video’ and ‘UMD Audio’ specification, allowing other types of distributors to ship their content to PSP users - Remember this is the year 2004 (when the iPod Photo had a 2" display).
These discs are presented with an unremovable caddy, the centre is magnetic so it attaches itself to the reader’s motor once the disc is inserted.
The ‘portable’ equivalent of the Memory Card is the Memory Stick Pro Duo, another product of Sony’s insistence to bring more mediums to a flooded market (remember the massive number of options back then? Even flashcarts acommodated many of them). This was released during the boom in consumer photography and cellphones, when people wanted lots of storage for a cheap price; and just before the SD card took over.
The Memory Stick, like the rest, is a protocol that interfaces internal memory (like Flash) with any peripheral in a way that’s convenient. So, you may swap cards between the computer and the camera without having disassemble anything. The ‘Pro Duo’ variant (used by the PSP) has a capacity of up to 32 GB and 1.23 MB/s read and 0.54 MB/s write speed.
The PSP relies on the Memory Stick to store user-related content, such as saves, media and games. It’s formatted with the FAT32 file system. The controller embedded in the Memory Stick can include MagicGate DRM and the PSP will read either type.
The contents are not memory mapped: The file system is accessed through system calls (kernel modules).
Eventually, Sony caught up with the competition and improved its online infrastructure. They even offered more services not yet provided by Microsoft or Nintendo.
This service superseded the primitive DNAS, previously deployed for the Playstation 2. One of the additions was the use of a centralised authentication system.
Users could register a free PSN account using the console, this enabled them to play with other people around the globe using WiFi connection.
It’s worth mentioning that at first, the PSP didn’t include many online services. This changed drastically with the release of the Playstation 3, but I guess this is a story for a later article…
Another thing that followed after the debut Playstation Network was the Playstation Store. As the name indicates, it’s an online store that allows users to acquire games digitally and download them on the Memory Stick.
I suppose this was a great relief for small game studios, as physical distribution always implied a significant cost, which would eventually impact the price of the game. Strangely enough, a later model of the PSP called ‘PSP Go’ enforced this process as it could only play games acquired from the Playstation Store (it lacked the UMD reader).
Later on, the game catalogue drastically expanded with the arrival of PS1 games. These were downloaded to the memory card and played like any other digital game. PS1 binaries on the PSP worked with the use of software emulation, Sony embedded an in-house emulator in the system to make all this work seamlessly.
Last but not least, online services provided the opportunity to download game patches (in the form of ‘updates’) directly from the console.
However, not many games used this feature. This is hard to conceive nowadays, as large game updates tend to be published before the game hits the store…
Just because this is a portable console doesn’t mean it should have weaker security than the PS2. It’s quite the opposite in all senses - The security system implemented on the PSP is very diverse, with some parts still remaining a mystery to this day.
Now, we all know by now that its implementation contained pitfalls that eventually lead to Homebrew and piracy, but considering it was released in 2004 and it’s a portable console, you may find that some algorithms bundled are state-of-the-art compared to the competition.
I’m going to describe the three main chips that compute security-related operations. The algorithms can be pretty complicated for first-timers, but I’ll try to give a quick overview. Don’t forget to check out the bibliography if you find it interesting, as this writing is primarily focused on the PSP.
Throughout the explanations, keep in mind that none of this information was documented by Sony for security reasons, in addition to labelling security-related routines with silly names.
Furthermore, I won’t be able to go over each cypher system, as it’s a tortuous topic and would divert the article from its main goal. Nonetheless, I invite you to learn about the logic behind each algorithm from other sources.
To start with, we got KIRK, another component inside Tachyon. KIRK is the implementation in hardware of the following algorithms (think of it as an accelerator):
In short, the CPU sends commands to KIRK (i.e. encrypt this string with algorithm x and key y). It can behave like a bus master as well, so it stores the results on main RAM right away.
As you know, UMD discs are not easily duplicated, but its contents are also stored in an encrypted form. Users will never notice this, nevertheless, since the decryption process is performed by hardware too.
Lepton is another System-on-Chip living alongside Tachyon, it controls the UMD drive and serves as a middle-man between the main CPU and UMD content.
Lepton contains an enormous amount of circuitry - you may even consider it another computer living inside the PSP. This component includes its own CPU, a DSP for decoding, 480 KB of memory (as buffer) and finally, 384 KB of ROM for storing its firmware.
The main CPU communicates to Lepton using the ATAPI protocol, an interface traditionally used for plugging conventional CD/DVD drives to PCs. The main difference, however, is that Lepton will decide whether to load & decrypt the UMD data (if the disc is authentic).
Apart from the encryption system handled by Lepton, UMD’s sectors are encrypted using AES. SPOCK is another block found next to KIRK that focuses on decrypting each sector of the UMD disc.
Inside NAND Flash, IDStorage stores an encrypted key known as ‘master key’. Thus, SPOCK contains a hardwired key to decrypt the ‘master key’. The decrypted master key is then used by SPOCK to decrypt another key found in the UMD. The latter key is then used to read each sector. Easy-peasy!
By the way, even though SPOCK is found within Tachyon, it’s operated by Lepton.
To sum up, having these routines in hardware allows the system to execute games without consuming general-purpose resources to apply encryption/decryption.
The operating system will use the hardware provided to compose a security system. Overall, the software is protected with the following principles:
I think the last thing hackers ever did was to give up on this console (maybe because the number of benefits made it very attractive for Homebrew development?). Please note that the amount of development in this area is outstanding, so I had to draw a line somewhere. Thus, only huge discoveries are mentioned here. In any case, playstationdev.wiki keeps a good archive of every single one.
After the release of the PSP in Japan, it was a matter of time before user-land exploits emerged, some of them were combined with the lack of security in early versions of the firmware:
These early blunders help to build a knowledge base of the inner workings of the PSP, which lead to more attack vectors and software routines to interact with the hardware (keep in mind only game studios had access to official SDKs and documentation).
As with any other cat and mouse game, Sony responded with more system updates (in addition to new games requiring them) while newer exploits (the so-called ‘TIFF’, ‘GTA’ exploit and so forth) kept appearing. It’s worth mentioning that these were only considered ‘Homebrew Launchers’ as kernel access wasn’t obtained yet.
As soon as Sony gained momentum with strong firmware updates with security patches and attractive features (i.e. a web browser), old versions became some sort of ‘promise land’, where advanced users enjoyed the ability to run their homebrew. However, acquiring a PSP with that system version became increasingly challenging. Thus, ‘downgrading’ quickly gained popularity. Downgrading is the opposite of upgrading, consisting of replacing the current firmware installed with one of lower version (and better exploited).
A common approach for performing a downgrade consists of executing an exploit that would trick the system into installing an old update file. This wasn’t easy as the latest system may not have been exploitable at that time.
Subsequently, two ‘modchips’ reached the market, ‘Undiluted Platinum’ and ‘PSP-Devolution’. They shipped with a separate NAND chip and was used as secondary NAND storage. Enabling to boot a secondary (and exploitable) firmware, or replace the primary one. This approach is only supported on the PSP model 1000 as later ones unified Tachyon and the NAND + DDR SDRAM package.
The ‘cat and mouse’ game was the order of the day until the so-called ‘Pandora’ arrived.
The ‘Pandora battery method’ is a popular (and respectable) collection of achievements. It managed to bypass most of the security layers and focused on where Sony could not react quickly, the Pre-IPL. This is what Pandora managed to succeed in:
What remains here is to embed a useful payload. Popular options included a ‘de-bricker’ which (re)installed a clean official firmware onto the PSP (thereby repairing it if the NAND was previously corrupted), a downgrader or a ‘custom firmware’ installer (more details later).
Don’t forget that all this was a tremendous task, especially if we take into account KIRK wasn’t reversed engineered and the encrypted block that makes Pre-IPL ‘jump’ had to be brute-forced.
The Pandora method represented a big hit for Sony, it was an effective bootrom exploit, and just like the Nintendo DS, fixes would only arrive in the form of new hardware revisions.
Furthermore, before Pandora was published, a so-called Custom Firmware or ‘CFW’ arrived. CFW is an official firmware with many modifications applied (such as Homebrew modules). These customisations will enjoy kernel privileges and as you may guess, they have complete control of the console. Examples of new modules included ISO loaders, signature disablers, low-level CPU management, a ‘plugin’ loader (to add more customisations without re-installing the firmware), and many, many more. Lots of hackers crafted their own flavour, such as M33, PRO and ME.
A CFW can be installed on top of the current firmware with the help of any kernel-level exploit (this was the earliest method). However, it can only be automatically booted with exploits previously used by Pandora to bypass signature checks. Otherwise, users need to rely on cat-and-mouse exploits to reboot to a CFW. That’s why the latest PSP models won’t be able to kickstart a CFW using the good-old methods.
In the end, the last straw happened when the security system of the Playstation 3 was hacked, as it contained the private keys used to decrypt PSP executables (the PS3’s OS includes a PSP emulator). This allowed anyone to sign user-land software and embed a kernel exploit to produce CFW installers and/or CFW loaders, for instance.
In recent developments, it was discovered that the latest firmware contains a kernel exploit during the boot process, which could be used to kickstart a CFW of choice. This was packaged in an solution called Infinity 2.
To sum it up, Sony was right when they claimed the UMDs were un-hackable. After all, hacking was achieved thanks to (many) flaws in software.
Not only development centred on breaking security mechanisms, but there were also communities committed to provide Homebrew developers with the necessary tools to build their software without legal repercussions. For instance, the pspdev group published an open-source SDK called PSPSDK that replicated many interfaces and didn’t enforce previous restrictions imposed by Sony.
PSPSDK also includes a toolkit to handle the compilation and packaging process, just like the official SDK but targeting a PSP running a CFW instead.
There you go, you’ve just finished reading about the last portable console before smartphones and tablets took over! I think this gives us an idea of what services/features users were expecting from portable handhelds in the early noughties - and how this evolved during the next decade.
Nevertheless, I want to thank the ‘PSP Homebrew Community’ discord for not only taking the time to proofread this endless article, but also to enlighten me with even more information. Various members of that group have dedicated a great effort to develop free tools and Homebrew applications to expand the capabilities of this console. My acknowledgement is also directed to all the authors that produced the documents listed in the sources section. It took me ~3 months to write this article, but it was possible thanks to the combined years of work that other people dedicated to reverse-engineer this console.
As for the next article, I’ll need to first take one month or two to focus on all the issues & requests submitted on the Github repo and do some maintenance work on the site as well, but rest assured I’m striving to make the next writing as complete as this one!
Until next time!
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may use it for your work at no cost, even for commercial purposes. But I ask that you reference it properly. Please take a look at the following citation guidelines:
## Academic styles For any referencing style, you can use the following information: - Title of article: PlayStation Portable Architecture - A Practical Analysis - Author: Rodrigo Copetti - URL: https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/playstation-portable/ - Date of publication: 21 Apr 2021 - Last modified: 21 Jul 2021 For instance, using the IEEE style: R. Copetti, "PlayStation Portable Architecture - A Practical Analysis", Copetti.org, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/playstation-portable/. [Accessed: day- month- year]. and Harvard style: Copetti, R., 2021. PlayStation Portable Architecture - A Practical Analysis. [online] Copetti.org. Available at: https://www.copetti.org/writings/consoles/playstation-portable/ [Accessed day month year]. ## Use in multimedia (Youtube, etc) I only ask that you include at least the author's name, title of article and URL of article, using any style of choice. You don't have to include all the information in the same place if it's not feasible. For instance, if you use the article's imagery in a Youtube video, you should state either the author's name or URL of article at the bottom of the image, and then include the complete reference in the video description. ## Appreciated additions If your work has been significantly influenced by any of this site's writings, I'd appreciate if you could dedicate an acknowledgement section, just like I do with the people/communities that helped me. This is of course optional and beyond the requirements of the CC license, but I think it's a nice detail that makes us, the random authors on the net, feel part of something bigger.
This article is part of the Architecture of Consoles series. If you found it interesting then please consider donating. Your contribution will be used to fund the purchase of tools and resources that will help me to improve the quality of existing articles and upcoming ones.
Big thanks to the following people for their donation:
- Alexander Perepechko - Andreas Kotes - Ben Morris - Cirilla Rose - Colin Szechy - Daniel Cassidy - David Portillo - Elizabeth Parks - Eric Haskins - eurasianwolf - Grady Haynes - Guillermo Angeris - Izsak Barnette - Josh Enders - Luke Wren - Matthew Butch - Olivier Cahagne - petey893 - Racri - Stuart Hicks - Thomas Finch - Thomas Peter Berntsen - Tim Cox
Alternatively, you can help out by suggesting changes and/or adding translations.
It's always nice to keep a record of changes.
## 2021-04-23 - Corrected sampling rate value, thanks /r/cracyc - Improved statement about Infinity, thanks @davee and @balika011 ## 2021-04-21 - Oven-ready! ## 2021-04-19 - Release Candidate draft - Fixed grammar and sorted out rest ## 2021-04-17 - Second draft finished. Thanks @artart78, @TBS-Frain_Breeze, @Draan, @Hedge and @balika011 from pspdev - TODO: Check grammar (again) and fix remaining photography ## 2021-04-11 - First draft finished. - Carlos, you need to get a PS4 and play Persona, no fuzz!